The Kipon 75mm f2.4 lens is a small, lightweight manual lens designed for mirrorless camera systems, including the Leica. It features 5 elements in 5 groups for incredible micro-contrast and color rendering and a 6-blade aperture for butter-smooth bokeh at f2.4.

I’ve shot on this lens since year one of its inception and I’ve gone through a few different copies over the years and now have a full range of experience as to what this lens is and what it can do.
You’ll see many mixed reviews of this lens, and much of that will be related to when the lenses were made.
There are a few different forms of this 75mm Kipon lens: the IBERIT and the Elegant. Optically, they are identical, but Kipon continues improving the build quality and precision. The Elegant lenses have a slightly different build, with a more modern and sleek look, whereas the IBERIT lenses have a little more of a classic touch.
The Leica M versions have a focusing rangefinder coupling designed to work with the Leica M rangefinder system. Because of this, a little more work, precision, and quality control are required to make these lenses, which slightly increases their cost.
Over the years, Kipon has dramatically improved the build quality of these lenses compared to what was originally designed. They have also invested in new, higher-precision Japanese machinery and set up a new factory in Shanghai. Now, these Kipon lenses are very high quality, easily matching the build quality of Voigtlander or Zeiss, or they might even be better. I like the way the new lenses feel more than most Voigtlander lenses.
There are now some new Mk II versions of these lenses available, and I’m told these have the best build quality and precision of anything they’ve built. Now that the new machinery in the new factory is all setup, I think these might be the lenses built on it.
I know and keep hearing from Kipon that they are very proud of these new lenses.
Kipon IBERIT 75mm f2.4 Lens Stats
Focal Length: 75mm (APS-C 112.5mm)
Aperture Blades: 6
Minimum Focus Distance: 2.3′ / 70 cm Leica M | 1.97′ (60 cm) Sony E & Fuji X
Front Element Filter Threads: ø49mm
Element Count: 5 elements 5 groups
CPU Contacts: No
Kipon Elegant / IBERIT 75mm f2.4 – Amazon
First Impressions

I bought two other Kipon lenses along with this one: the 35mm f2.4 and the 50mm f2.4. Of the three, the 75mm stood out to me the most. It’s very clear that Kipon has made a true gem here. It’s an outstanding lens with incredible image quality for both full-frame and APS-C cameras, and I’ve really come to love it.
My favorite Kipon lenses right now are the 35mm f2.4 and the 75mm f2.4. Compared to everything else I have, I just really like these lenses in general.
While it’s the Kipon 75mm is only f2.4, on a 75mm lens, that’s plenty fast, and it produces some really shallow depth with incredible bokeh. I have faster manual lenses at about this focal length, but they’re a lot more difficult to focus on the fly; they’re also a lot heavier. The performance when wide open at f2.4 is also nice, so you don’t have to worry about any significant loss in image quality when shooting wide open, like many retro lenses.

For me, this lens was a missing link, I’m always looking for high-quality, lightweight lenses that don’t feel cheap for street photography, and this 75mm f2.4 fills in that gap perfectly


I first started using this lens on my Sony full-frame cameras, like the A7rIII, and now I have an Elegant version for my Nikon Z6. On both cameras, the performance was amazing, with a lot of contrast and color, and the overall rendered images felt very alive.

Using Kipon IBERIT 75mm With The Fujifilm

I’m hearing this lens works great on the GFX system when run in the Full Frame crop mode, but I’ve only used this lens with Fujifilm’s APS-C system, which has been a lot of fun.
Using the IBERIT 75mm on Fujifilm cameras is much easier as their cameras have the best focus peaking. However, the APS-C sensor will give you a field of view of about a 112mm lens. So you have to keep in mind when buying a 75mm lens, that a field of view of 112mm isn’t the most useful focal length for daily usage or street photography, but it can be really nice for portrait or street portrait work.

Image quality is outstanding since the APS-C sensor naturally crops in on the circle of projection produced by this lens. This gives even better corner and edge performance with less vignetting overall, which was already very good on the full-frame cameras.

Quality And Performance
The Kipon 75mm f2.4 lens is absolutely perfect for street and portrait photography. Is relatively small for its size, and fairly light. The focus is smooth and the aperture has nice firm clicks that feel good.
Overall I would still rate this lens as a more classic design with a more retro rendering. A lot of punch a lot of pop and great micro-contrast and color.



Build Quality
The design of the Kipon 75mm f2.4 is nice with all-metal construction, anodized aluminum outer casing, and brass helicoils. It’s also very light.
Nobody makes better-feeling lenses than Leica, but the Elegant versions of these lenses are actually very nice and definitely up there with the bigger brands.
On the older version of this lens, there was some very subtle wiggle between the two focus barrels when the focus is fully extended, this has been improved on with the new Elegant lens, but I would say this is nothing unusual as even my Voigtlander lenses do this and even Leica lenses can loosen up over time.
With the year-one version of the IBERIT lens, you can also hear the cold metal of the aperture blades rubbing against each other as you adjust the aperture, this is completely gone with the new Elegant lens.



With the year-one version, when you give the lens a light shake, you do hear some movement; again, whatever that was has been totally fixed with the Elegant lens.
I’ve had a few issues with other Kipon lenses, but at least the optics have never been an issue. So far, every Kipon lens, except the version II of the 40mm f0.85 lens I’ve tested, has had perfect optical performance out of the box.
Leica Calibration
Some of my early lenses were also not perfectly calibrated for the rangefinder Leica system, and it’s not possible to adjust them yourself. The last lens I received was perfectly calibrated.
The aperture ring has half-stop clicks. With the Elegant lens, this is buttery smooth with the perfect amount of tension. This was good on the year-one version of this lens as well, but it has improved.
Focus Throw
The focus throw is a little shallow at about 90 degrees, the advantage is it allows you to throw the focus quickly, but you do need to be a little careful when shooting for perfect focus. I personally haven’t had any issues with focus precision considering f2.4 isn’t really that shallow, but some people may not like the 90-degree focus throw on a lens this long.
The minimum focus distance is 2.3′ on the Leica M variant of this lens. On the Sony E, Fujifilm X, and Leica L, it’s a touch closer at 1.97′. I find 2.3′ to be fine with this lens.
Feel
In terms of quality and tactile feel, the focus on this lens is buttery smooth and it’s a real pleasure to use. The only minor imperfection I see with this lens is when the lens is close to being fully extended, the focus turn does lose some of the tension, as the Helicoil extends and has less contact. Basically, when the focus is set close, there is more resistance in the focus turn, compared to when it is fully extended.

Durability
The original Kipon 75mm lenses did have some issues with durability but this has all been pretty much fixed. Kipon now has new factories and new machines and even their Leica M range finder calibration is really dialed in.
As a side note for Leica shooters, you can’t adjust the range finder calibration like with some of the cheaper third-party brands, this has to be done in the factroy.
I’ve been using the 75mm Elegant lens on my Nikon Z camera for almost a year now, and it’s absolutely a tank. It shows no signs of weakness even after heavy use.
Sharpness

Sharpness is all around very nice. It’s good in the center and stays good in the corners.
It’s sharper than a lot of my “classic” lenses except for a few. In early tests, I saw that the Kipon 50mm lens is actually a touch sharper than this one, and the Voigtlander 35mm f1.7 is actually sharper as well. Yes, I know, two completely different focal lengths.
The bottom line is, sharpness is not an issue with this lens. It won’t blow you away, especially by today’s standards but I won’t disappoint you either, and is totally fine if you’re shooting a film. I’ll try to get some Leica M11 samples up soon as well.
This is the Mk I version tested here. It’s possible the new versions have been improved.







Portrait Sharpness
My daughter was moving around a lot, but I managed to get a few shots at f5.6.
I shot this using an Einstein 640 with the Fujifilm X-Pro2. ISO 200, f5.6, 1/60.
Again, it’s not as sharp as something like a Nikon Z 50mm f1.8, but for a manual-focus lens, this is acceptable.


Diffraction & Spherical Aberrations
The center of the lens has a blue tint, which clears up at around f5.6. In terms of sharpness, f4 to f8 render the most detail.
At f11, the lens is still very usable, with only some loss in IQ from diffraction. By f16, however, you will see a significant loss in detail and micro-contrast.

Chromatic Aberrations
This lens has some chromatic aberrations. They are nothing serious, but they are not quite as correct as some of the modern lenses with more complicated designs.

Vignetting
Some vignetting at f2.4, by f4 it clears up. By f5.6 it’s almost completely gone.
There is also a noticeable bright spot in the center until about f4. You can especially see it in the Chromatic Aberration sample above.

Distortion
The Kipon 75mm only has some very minor barrel distortion, that’s about it.

Flaring
Flaring is fairly well controlled, but nothing like a modern Fujifilm or Nikon lens.
I haven’t really noticed it being an issue in casual shooting, so I took it out and shot into the sun. Even at f2.4 and shooting directly into the sun I still see only moderate flaring with only some noticeable reduction in color and contrast.



Personally, I like a lens that will flare a little.
Art And Character

I’ve been adding art and character to my reviews. It’s not quantifiable, really, and most lens reviews fail to discuss this. In my opinion, this is what makes a lens great. If you were reviewing cars, this would be how a car drives or handles. Some cars might have a lot of horsepower, quick breaking, a good safety rating, etc., but is it fun to drive?
With lenses, the art and character can make or break a lens.
What is the art and character of a lens?
It’s a few things, color rendering, depth rendering, or as some people are now calling the “transition zones.” This is how the image renders between the areas that are in focus out of focus. Then there is bokeh, contrast, and micro-contrast.
Color Rendering
I’ve tuned the color in all the sample photos in this review (except in the charts), but not by a lot. I usually just apply a film look, brush in some extra contrast and clarity into the subject and that’s about it.
What I’m noticing, and you can see in the image below, is a very rich color even in the bokeh. If you’re ever wondering why some photographers have such deep and rich colors in their images, a lot of it has to do with the lens and the Kipon 75mm will give you that.


Foreground To Background Separation | 3D Pop
What gives that 3D pop? A few things – good contrast, micro-contrast, and good foreground-to-background separation.
You can really see what I’m talking about in the images below. The subject looks almost cut out from the foreground and background, almost like fake 3D. Even at f2.4, it creates a very beautiful subject separation you just don’t see very often, especially in a lens that you can get for under $500-$600.

Contrast & Micro Contrast
Micro-contrast is different from just contrast. Micro-contrast has to do with inner tonal details, which give the illusion of sharpness and detail even when you’re not pixel-peeping. It usually, but not always, has to do with how many elements a lens has. Ultimately, the more glass light has to pass through, the more of the structure of the light is lost. For example, you’ll notice your images take a huge hit in quality if you shoot through your car windshield.Â
The Kipon with its 5 elements in 5 groups has incredible micro-contrast. Images always look very detailed and the contrast is very lovely. It’s an excellent lens for black-and-white photography.
I thought this image below was an incredible testimony to the contrast and micro-contrast of this lens. There is just so much detail in the skin tones.
Bokeh
Bokeh is buttery smooth and very rich. Even at f5.6 bokeh is still very pretty even though it only has only a 6-bladed aperture. At higher f-stops, you will see some hexagonal bokeh.
There is a slight swirl with some cat’s-eye bokeh along the edges.







Kipon Elegant 75mm f2.4 Review | Bottom Line
Should you get this lens? For Fujifilm, there just aren’t many other options other than going with cheap Rokinon / Samyang lenses. There are a few for Sony if you’re willing to spend the cash. I can’t speak for the Loxia lenses in terms of quality and durability, but Zeiss does have a great reputation if you’re willing to spend twice as much money for their 85mm.
There are many faster long lenses now by companies like Voigtlander, TTArtisan, or even 7Artisans, and sometimes they are great, and sometimes they are less expensive. TTArtisan has been making nice lenses lately, but it just depends on what you need and what style you shoot in.
The Kipon lenses’ build quality is much better than that of 7Artisans and TTArtisan, so while you’re sometimes paying more money for a slower lens, you’re getting better build quality and probably better micro-contrast.
This lens is nice for the price. For Leica M shooters who don’t need a super-fast lens, this is one of the best affordable options. There is the Leica 75mm f2, but that lens is in a totally different price category.
This lens is a great deal, and I’ll add the rest of the Kipon lenses to my collection.
I’ve been very happy with the IBERIT 75mm, which is currently one of my favorite lenses for street photography. It’s great as a full-frame lens but also as an APS-C lens.

Kipon 75mm f2.4 Sample Photos
Sample photos are shot with the Sony A7r III in full frame and in Super 35mm crop mode. Some are also shot with the Fujifilm X-Pro2.














Did you like this review? Is there something you want to see more or less of? With my reviews, I’m trying to take a more real-world approach to how the lens is used when shooting actual photography rather than building the most extreme situations to find flaws in the design that you would never see in real-world settings. But I will get more technical if that’s what people want. Let me know in the comments.
**This website contains affiliate links. We will earn a small commission on purchases made through these links. Some of the links used in these articles will direct you to Amazon. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. |
Thanks for the review. Been trying to find out more info on this lens. Currently I’ve got the Voigtländer 75mm f/2.5 Color-Heliar which is also damn nice lens and probably the “better” lens. Similar in size & weight when used with the CV closeup adapter. But I don’t care about the hassle with adapter when focusing up close. So I would buy the native mount version. What is drawing me to this Kipon is the overall rendering, esp. bokeh which seems really nice. And I love how it looks on camera.
I’m using the Sony A7III. I used to be a Fuji user for couple years, but it was the love for adapted lenses that brought me to Sony (film lenses are more at home on fullframe sensor) and now as I’ve tasted the native Voigtländers (CV21/3.5 & CV40/1.2) I just can’t go back to crop sensor. And the 75mm FL is just the perfect companion for my wider CV’s. Might just have to buy this lens and make comparisons with the Color-Heliar. 🙂
PS. There are tricks to improve the focus peaking a bit, by adding sharpness and contrast, found in “styles” in menu. And once you learn to visualize the “jitter” pixels you should be able to nail focus fast even with peaking. Works best on the sharper lenses when using the wider apertures. Sure, I agree Fuji has better peaking but I can easily live with the one we have on Sony.
This is probably the nicest of the Handevision / Kipon lenses. They’ve also updated the build quality since their first batch after partnering up with some new designers out of Germany. So the Handevision lenses now are kind of Mk1.5 lenses, so I’m told by the owner of Kipon. Kipon / Handevision actually makes really nice stuff, they have all the precision machinery to do things right which is pretty cool and rare for a Chinese lens company. There are only a few that can do it really well, but they’re all getting better. Like Mitakon is on MkIII with some of their lenses designs now.
Kipon is kind of like Voigtlander in that they stick with the classic way of doing things, no plastic elements, no gimmicks etc. All metal barrel, stainless steel mounts.
Definitely grab the Kipon lenses in the native mount if you can. They don’t design lenses for specific brands, but they do shift the design / element to adjust for the closer flange distance for the E-Mount compared to the M-Mount and this can improve some performance around the corners and edges.
I noticed the Sony A9 firmware version 5 gave some love to focus peaking. Hopefully that makes its way down to the other cameras.
Yes, I really love all the Voigtländers I’ve used and I’ve also tried many of the Meike & 7artisans lenses that you have reviewed (mostly while still on Fuji). I really like reading your articles, so thank you. We seem to have very similar preferences on lenses we like to use. Sometimes a lens that is “good enough” can be the most pleasing to use, compared to more expensive and “perfect” lenses. The 7artisans 35mm f/1.2 was my favourite on Fuji as a character lens. Sure it wouldn’t hurt if the Kipon’s build quality was closer to Voigtländer than 7artisans.
So I just ordered the 75mm Iberit with the clip-on hood for Sony E mount. Not bad price nowadays on ebay, straight from Kipon. Once I have it, I’m going to make some comparison tests against the old Voigtländer 75mm f/2.5 Color-Heliar (my current 75mm favourite) and will post something about it on Fred Miranda’s Sony forum. Seems that not too many people are aware of these Kipon lenses and there are a lot of critics around, possibly because of their earlier build quality issues or not-that-great flare- & CA-performance witnessed on some of their lenses (but not all).
Can you link me your comparison against that Voigtlander 75mm when you’re done pls? (if you can remember)
I actually hope Kipon makes some more lenses. I was going to order the Elegant lenses to review on the Z6 to see how the build is different. I love that 75mm though. It’s so much fun to shoot with and is so light.
I really want to try out their 90mm but haven’t seen any great reviews on it yet. A lot of people are overly critical with these classic style lenses but that 90mm is only 4 elements which means it’s going to be a micro-contrast god. The only other lens I know of with 4 elements is the Industar 50-2. try to get that lens on ebay, it’s a fun one and you can find them for like $30-$60.
I’ll remember. No problem. I think I’ll add the FE 85mm as well, as a “modern baseline”.
I actually looked for the 90mm first but after reading about it, everyone said the 75mm was clearly the better one.
I think I’ll try the 90mm though. The 4 element aspect of it means it will have insane micro-contrast.
Also hoping you have time to do the Meike 50mm review soon. Had my eyes on that lens and would love to see images you’ve been able to produce with it. (Nikon Z6 has pretty much the same sensor as my Sony A7III.) One of the reasons I like your blog is that I don’t care for the dull unedited “sooc” shots, sharpness tests and images of brickwalls, but I’m more interested how they fare on some talented hands. I just love that you have the “art and character” portion there, which is the most valuable part for me.
I’ve been shooting with it a lot lately so expect a review soon. I think I’m going to do that review next. The Meike 35mm f1.4 was going to be my next review but that lens disappeared from stores so I guess I’ll do this full frame version.
I’ll see if I can get to it sooner, It’s spring in Japan so I’ve actually been shooting landscapes a lot more while the weather is nice.
Here’s my first comparisons (look for nickname Tonzah78):
https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1534980/
What surprised me was how close to Color-Heliar this Kipon is. Sharpness and rendering are almost mirror-images of each other. In the end I think I will keep my Color-Heliar, as I like the build quality tiny bit more and the Color-Heliar is a bit more contrasty and tiny bit less haze & CA in bright subjects. It’s a tough call and it’s a pretty much a tie in every department. The differences are so small it really doesn’t matter in the end. But I just think I like to keep a kit of three Voigtländer lenses, just for consistency’s sake.
Awesome work thanks. It looks like there isn’t really an advantage to going with native E mount vs M-Mount for this lens too if it’s performing pretty close to the Voigtlander. Some M Voigtlander lenses perform wildly different depending on what camera you throw them on.
Thanks. The longer the lens, better it usually performs when adapted. So I’ve noticed. The smearing and increased vignetting usually comes with the wider FL’s (this happened with the 28mm Ultrons that I had). And this Color-Heliar is pretty awesome lens to begin with. It’s a little marvel of a lens. Voigtländer discontinued the tiny Color-Heliar when they introduced the 75mm f/1.8 Heliar Classic which hasn’t been quite as popular among forums (more harsh “classic” rendering). And now the f/1.8 Heliar Classic has been discontinued since they’ve announced the new 75mm f/1.5 Nokton, which I’ll surely buy when it arrives sometime this year. From the few sample images I’ve seen, taken in CP+ expo this year, it seems to render much like their other new Noktons (namely 40mm and 50mm f/1.2) and still keeping the weight and size down.
That’s good to know. I think when I get through reviewing these Chinese lenses I’ll maybe jump into some more Voigtlanders. I wonder if they’ll ever do native mounts for Canon and Nikon.
The new Voigtländer 40mm and 50mm f/1.2’s are pretty stellar. They are “expensive”, but I know you would love them so much they would feel like a bargain. I first bought the 40mm f/1.2 M-mount version when I still had Fujis more than a year ago and fell in love with it immediately, but it was not until I switched to A7III when real magic started happening. Shot the whole summer with this pair. The IQ was pretty stellar even with the M-mount version, but as I wanted to have EXIF & aperture data etc. since I could see this lens becoming my #1 lens, I decided to sell it and eventually get the E-mount version. The M-mount version optically is so close to E-mount even on Sony sensor stack, that I could imagine it would be pretty great with Nikon, Canon or Panasonic as well. Same with the 50mm f/1.2. They are optically pretty identical, except for the FL. The 50 has less onion rings and is a tiny bit sharper, but the rendering is quite identical. At the CP+ expo this year Voigtländer also teased some E-mount to Z-mount adapters. So Nikon users can soon adapt E-mount voigtländers as well, but I guess they won’t have electronic contacts. And the M-mount versions are so close optically that their smaller size and weight are their advantage when adapted. And they are more “future proof” as M-mount can be adapted to any mirrorless.
I wonder how much tuning they do for the E-Mount lenses compared to the M mount. I notice typically M lenses have a much greater minimum focus distance then E-Mount with other brands like those Handevision lenses. But maybe I’ll start collecting some of the E-Mount voigtlanders for my A7rIII. I wanted that 40 and the 50mm.
I got this lens but the quality was not good. The aperture ring was very hard to turn which was realy an issue (it was realy bad) and there where unusual dark blue chromatic aberration that i have never seen on any lens before that i have used until now. I returned it. The rest looked fine but sadly it is not recommended like that. Even for the price. There are better lenses