The Voigtlander 35mm f/1.7 is an excellent lens for those who want something relatively compact without sacrificing fantastic image quality. It’s not the smallest 35mm lens you can buy, but it’s not the biggest. It’s in that sweet spot.
While there are faster lenses, the f1.7 is still a great place to be, especially for a lens this size.
First Impressions
I’ve been buying Leica M-mount lenses because I shoot on both the Fujifilm and Sony systems, and having lenses that work on both is highly beneficial. I ultimately purchased this lens to function as a 50mm on my Fujifilm, where the APS-C crop makes it almost flawless, but it also works great as a 35mm on the Sony A7R III.
This lens is beautiful physically. Silver looks fantastic, but black is less likely to clash with your body unless you have a silver Leica or Fuji.
The focus ring is very smooth, and its images are incredibly sharp, even to the edges, with slight softness in the corners.
Using UV Filters:
To use a UV filter with the hood that comes with the lens, you have to screw the filter onto the lens and then screw the lens hood onto the filter. Therefore, ensure you obtain a UV filter with front threads.
If you purchase the additional lens hood, then you get a two-part kit – A threaded barrel that screws onto the lens that also has threads for the UV filter. You’ll attach your UV filter to this barrel, then attach the barrel to the lens. Then the hood lays over the top of the barrel and has a thumb-tightening screw. It’s pretty fancy.
Technical Characteristics
The focus ring is nice to use. I also like the aperture ring, although it took me a minute to get used to it being located at the end of the lens, rather than near the base. Aperture clicks feel just right—not too soft or too hard. I haven’t had any issues accidentally changing the aperture.
When focusing, the lens telescopes in and out, a feature that sometimes can cause more dust to be pulled into the lens by the vacuum created by the lens expanding and contracting. I haven’t had the lens long enough to know whether it’s an issue. It will be fine in most shooting situations; you probably wouldn’t want to take it to Burning Man.
There are no other issues. There are just a few quirks that I’ll go over.
Vignetting
Vignetting is one characteristic we must accept with smaller lenses like this. I don’t mind it, and it’s not as bad on this lens as it is on some of their other lenses, like the 15mm Heliar III. By f/4, it clears up nicely, but is still visible even at higher apertures.
Additionally, there is no Lightroom profile correction available for this lens, so if you notice vignetting, you will need to remove it manually.
I’ll test this lens on more cameras, but expect it to perform differently on different systems as they all have different sensor stacks. I imagine we’ll see less vignetting on the Canon EOS R compared to the A7 III due to the smaller focus stack.
Voitglander 35mm f1.7 On The EOS R
When using the EOS R, noticeable purple vignetting is present at all apertures. It’s easy to fix with a radial gradient adjustment and a shifted green white balance (WB) in Lightroom.
Note that this is less of an issue in the newer Canon R bodies.
Corner and edge sharpness is better with Voigtlander 35mm f1.7 on the EOS R than with the Sony A7rIII or any full-frame E-Mount.
Field Curvature
Field Curvature occurs when you focus on the center of your lens and your background falls out of focus, except for some areas along the edges, on a slightly different focal plane than your center subject. Sony’s stacked CMOS sensor or the microlens configuration might cause this characteristic. I haven’t found any good samples of this yet; only some minor issues aren’t worth posting.
Sharpness
You may not like that this lens has a minimum focusing distance of 0.5m. However, close focus with this lens isn’t great anyway, and if you want to capture sharp images at anything under f5.6, you’ll need to be a few feet away from your subject. I’ve found that anything under three feet at f1.7 to f5.6 yields slightly softer images due to spherical aberrations. Step back, and things are razor-sharp again.
This is not uncommon. I have the same issue with my Fuji X100T.
Regardless, here is a sharpness test taken about 2-3 feet away at f5.6. From the corners to the edges, it’s looking great, much better than my Zeiss Sonnar f2.8 in the edges.
The center to edges look great. The corners do soften slightly, but only at the extreme corners.
Chromatic Aberrations
This lens very well controls chromatic aberrations. I’ve yet to encounter them as an issue, and I struggle to find negative examples in my day-to-day photography.
Of all the photos of architecture I’ve taken that shoot up into the sky, only a few have any chromatic aberrations. This was one of the rare examples. And this is as bad as it gets.
Diffraction & Aperture Control
This is more related to your sensor’s pixel pitch, but I still like to do diffraction tests with each lens to see how the lens center sharpness performs at all the different apertures.
Bokeh
The Bokeh isn’t perfectly circular and might have a very subtle swirl, but I wouldn’t say it goes as far as having the cat-eye effect.
With that 10-blade aperture, it looks very creamy.
Sunstars & Flaring
Voigtlander lenses always produce nice sun stars, even at lower apertures. You can get them even at f2.8. This one is at f5.6.
It’s also tough to get this lens to flare.
Focus Shifting
Focus shifting is when the focus changes slightly as you change your aperture. If you’re focused at f/1.7, you might not be in focus when you change your aperture to f/5.6. I’ve found that to be the case with this lens. When performing the diffraction test, from f/1.7 to about f/5.6, I had to adjust the focus at each aperture setting; otherwise, it would shift as I stopped down. The difference isn’t huge; most people probably won’t notice. However, if you want to be precise, refocusing will make a noticeable difference after adjusting the aperture.
Voigtlander 35mm f1.7 Ultron Review | Conclusions
If you’re looking for an all-manual 35mm lens for your Sony or even your Leica at this price, this lens is it. Buying it should be a no-brainer. For how I shoot and what I shoot, I do not need anything better than this, and there aren’t many lenses that are better than this for these systems at this size.
It works well on the Sony A7R III and is an amazing 50mm on the Fujifilm XT3. It’s a great lens, regardless of the system you’re using.
The focus is silky smooth, it’s crazy fast for its size, and the optics are pretty close to perfect. I love this thing.
Using Adapters
On my Sony cameras, I use the Voigtlander VM to E-mount adapter. I also use the official Fujifilm adapter on my Fujifilm cameras because it features a button that allows you to access the mount adapter settings instantly. You can use the Kipon adapters for the EOS R and Nikon Z.
If you’re looking for a budget-friendly adapter, consider K&N Concept.
Voigtlander 35mm f1.7 Ultron Samples Photos
| **This website contains affiliate links. We will earn a small commission on purchases made through these links. Some of the links used in these articles will direct you to Amazon. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. |
Do you know if the newer Ultron 1.7 35mm mounts correctly with the Fuji-made adapter?
Yes, that’s what I use.
Great review as usual and your shots are excellent. I recently bought the EOS R and am using the Kipon elegant 50mm based on your review of the similar Handevision lens. It’s great especially for $350. I’m very interested in the Ultron but the purple vignetting gives me pause. If you were exclusively using this lens on the EOS R would you buy it? it’s much larger but I’m also considering the Canon 35mm F1.4L I which I’m finding on eBay for around $800.
I probably wouldn’t buy this lens if I only had the EOS R at this time. I would probably shop around to see what else I could find and wait and see if Voigtlander makes some native RF mount lenses.
The purple vignetting is very easy to fix though. I just build a profile in Lightroom that adds a circle gradient that shifts purple to green. But it’s a lot of money to spend on a lens that doesn’t perform perfectly.
Granted, it also lacks corner sharpness and edge sharpness on the Sony E-Mount system, but at least that’s not really something you can see unless you know what you’re looking for and I only discovered that after comparing corner performance on the EOS R which is improved.
Compared to handevision 35mm f2.4, which one have better color rendering?
Hmm, I haven’t really done a side by side of these two lenses. They’re just so different it’s hard to compare like that. But I would say maybe the Handevision, little bit better tonal rendering and contrast, but the Voigtlander produces a much pretty image overall because of that f1.7 aperture and the focus falloff and depth you get.
When I shot this lens with Sony, the only way I could correct the field curvature and get good corners was by using a front correction filter, but doing this changed the infinity focus point of the lens and a shorter adapter was needed. I never could find an adapter short enough so I gave up trying….
Switching to the Nikon Z I’ve revisited this lens and I’ve found that it works amazingly well on it, field curvature is controlled much better than on the Sony cameras. Wide open there is still curvature but by f/2.8 it’s largely under control. It’s good enough that it can be used for astro at f/2.8. There’s no need for a correction filter at all on Nikon Z due to the much thinner sensor stack. I’d say the correction due to the Nikon Z sensor stack is about equal to being used on a Sony with a front correction filter, but without the need for a short adapter.