To expand on the comparison between RAW and JPEG with the Fuji film simulators, I put together a test that also compares how the Fuji Film Simulators in Lightroom differ from those of the Iridient Developer.
Since we already can see that Iridient is a step ahead in terms of overall image quality from the Iridient vs Lightroom Detail Comparison, it should be interesting to see how the color profiles compare as well.
Something to keep in mind, the camera simulations in Lightroom and Iridient are not actually built by the camera manufacturers. They are built for the software to mimic the looks of the JPEG camera profiles you see in the camera as close as possible. The developer over at Iridient even continues to update and tune his. So I used the latest at the time of this post, v3.3.
The image was shot with the Fuji X100T in RAW ISO 250, f4.0 with a 1/60sec shutter.
Lightroom Vs. Iridient – Camera Profiles
I tried to keep the image’s subject matter to something relatable but that also had a good blend of colors and tones.
Standard Profile
The default software profiles. Adobe Default, and Fuji X100T Default

IR – Default

LR – Default
Provia

IR – Provia

LR – Provia
Velvia

IR – Velvia

LR – Velvia
Astia

IR – Astia

LR – Astia
Classic Chrome

IR – Classic Chrome

LR – Classic Chrome
Pro Neg Hi

IR – ProNegHi

LR – ProNegHi
Pro Neg Std

IR – ProNegStd

LR – ProNegStd
**This website contains affiliate links. If you want to support this site, we will earn a small commission on any purchase made through these links. |